Muhammed Ali v. Shabina
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case arising from an FIR under Secs. 498A, 406, and 506 IPC, quashing further proceedings after the complainant filed an affidavit stating the dispute was settled.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Miscellaneous Case allowed; further proceeding in Crime No. 597/2008 quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3360 of 2011()
------------------------------------CRIMENO.597/2008 OF PERAMBRA POLICE STATION ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSDD 1 - 3
----------------------------------------------
1. MUHAMMAD ALI, S/O. MOOSA, AGED 29 YEARS, KOYILAMBALATH HOUSE, MEPPAYUR AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE.
2. AYISHA, W/O. MOOSA HAJI, AGED 48 YEARS, KOYILAMBALATH HOUSE, MEPPAYUR AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE.
3. SIDHIQ, S/O. ABDULLA, AGED 43 YEARS, MUDHOTTIL HOUSE, MEPPAYUR AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Case filed against accused need to be set aside in view of settlement of dispute between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muhammad Ali
- petitioner
Ayisha
- petitioner
Sidhiq
- respondent
Shamina
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court