Beena v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Accused sought permission to argue for discharge without physical presence. Court directed Magistrate to hear counsel and dispensed with physical presence until discharge order.
What did the court decide?
dispensed with physical presence of accused for interlocutory hearing on discharge
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2011 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1933
Crl.MC.No. 2760 of 2011()
------------------------CC.No.1198 of 2007 IN KALPAKANCHERI POLICE STATION CRIME NO.226 OF 2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT - 1, TIRUR
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.1
BEENA, D/O.VELAYUDHAN, AGED 28 YEARS, MEDAKUNNU MALAYIL HOUSE, KAKODI, MUTTOLIL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS
RESPONDENT): COMPLAINANT
-------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALANCHERY BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the presence of the accused in court must be insisted upon while the petition for discharge is pending before the Magistrate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Accused No. 1
- respondent
Complainant
Coram
N.K. Balakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court