Jmj Silvester v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2011 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1933
Crl.MC.No. 1394 of 2011()
CRRP.15/2010 of SESSIONS COURT, WAYANAD, KALPETTA
PETITIONER / REVISION PETITIONER / DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JMJ SILVESTER, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.AMBROS, JMJ AUTOMOBILES, PRESIDENT KARUNA GENERAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY NO.156/06, MANANTHAVADY, PIN-670645, WAYANADU DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN
RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENT / STATE :
-----------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANANTHAVADY POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V.MANU
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
...2/-
Crl.MC.No. 1394 of 2011()
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE'S
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE'S - NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
==================================== Crl. M.C. No.1394 of 2011
==================================== Dated this the 15th day of June, 2011
O R D E R
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition without prejudice to other rights if any of petitioner. Submission is recorded.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to other rights if any of petitioner.
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.
vsv
JMJ Silvester
State of Kerala
Thomas P.Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court