Jayan I.D. v. P.G.Hanifa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal that had been pending for over eight years due to incomplete service upon the appellant, rejecting a request for further time.
What did the court decide?
The criminal appeal is dismissed; request for further time is rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933
CRL.A.No. 65 of 2003()
---------------------ST.2827/1999 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THRISSUR
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
JAYAN I.D., AGED 35, S/O. DAMODHARAN, INNARAN HOUSE, P.O. VADANAPPILLY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS/ ACCUSED AND STATE OF KERALA:
- P.G. HANIFA, S/O. GAFOOR, PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, MUTTICHUR P.O., PADIYAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal admits to proceed after prolonged pendency and incomplete service.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
JAYAN I.D.
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
P.G. HANIFA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court