State of Kerala v. P.M.Sreenivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
CRL.A.No. 1417 of 2008() -----------------------CC.22/1992 of ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER & SPECIAL JUDGE, KOZHIKODE ....................
APPELLANT(S): COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. (CRIME NO.5/HQ/85/VIG.HQ,TVPM).
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA.T.Y.
RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------
1. P.M.SREENIVASAN, FORMER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PAZHASSI IRRIGATION PROJECT DIVISION NO.II, THALIPARAMBA, (LAXMI NEAR GOVERNMENT POLY TECHNIC, WEST HILL, CALICUT-5).
2. V.D.UDAYAKUMAR, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.INDIRA ENGG.CORPORATION, & M/S.DEEPA AGENCIES, COIMBATORE (5/18, VEERAKERALAM, COIMBATORE).
R1 BY ADVS.SRI.K.P.SUDHEER, SMT.P.JAYALAKSHMI. R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
Crl.A.No.1417 of 2008
Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011.
This appeal is preferred at the instance of the State challenging the judgment dated 24.4.2004 in C.C.No.22 of 1992 of the court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge-Kozhikode, by which the learned Judge acquitted the accused, who are two in numbers and who faced the charge under Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of the P.C. Act and under Section 109 and 120B of IPC.
2
Crl.A.No.1417 of 2008
of charge sheet originally filed as 8/89 and tried as C.C.16/92) submitted before the court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge-Kozhikode. From the above report it appears that, the investigation agency has considered the scope for refiling a fresh charge and it is found that eight accused were expired and there is only remote probability of making available the evidence before the court and the important Investigating Officer is also no more. It is also reported that, no appeal was filed before the Apex court against the acquittal of the accused in similar other appeals, as there is no possibility of getting a conviction, in case an appeal is filed. Accordingly, by the above report it was requested to drop further action in charge sheet filed as 8/89 against Sri.V.K.Suseelan, Sri.S.Krishna Iyer (8) and Sri.V.D.Udayakumar, who are the accused in 5/HQ/85, which was tried along with C.C.No.16 of 1992, as a mistake of fact. According to me, recording the submission of the
3
Crl.A.No.1417 of 2008
learned Public Prosecutor and Annexure R1(a) report, this appeal can be dismissed as ' not pressed ' .
In the result, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
V.K.MOHANAN, Judge
ami/
State of Kerala
P.M.SREENIVASAN
V.D.UDAYAKUMAR
V.K.MOHANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court