This contention is a contempt of court case filed against a respondent in WPC 11316/2011. The petitioners submitted that the compliance order dated 07.04.2011 was served. Held: No further orders; case closed.
Contempt of court case closed as no further orders were needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 871 of 2011(S)
------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.11316/2011 Dated 07/04/2011
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS
BY ADV. SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN
RESPONDENTS/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C)
J.REJI KUMAR,(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS)THE DIRECTOR(ARCHAEOLOGY) DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SREEPADAM,SREEPADAM PALACE,FORT.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695035.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. M.R. SABU.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE © No. 871 OF 2011 IN
W.P.(C( 11316 OF 2011
......................................................................... Dated this the 20th August , 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing the contempt case, the petitioners have been served with an order whereby the direction given vide judgment dated
07.04.2011 has been complied with.
In the above circumstance, no further orders are called for.
The Contempt of Court Case is closed accordingly.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
lk
Sankaran Ilayath
Arunthathi Devi Antherjanam
J. Reji Kumar
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
