Petitioner complained of non-compliance with a previous judgment in a contempt case. Respondent produced an order claiming compliance. With the petitioner absent, the court recorded production and closed the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 829 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------(OF JUDGEMENT IN WPC NO.12622/2010 DATED 29/7/2010)
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
P.K.MURALEEDHARAN KARTHA, AGED 49, S/O.SAVITHRIKUNJAMMA, PUTHUPPARAMBATH MADATHIL KANAKKU, ERAMALLOOR DESOM, EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.A.SHIHAB
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------
C.THAMPI PAUL, TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. PIN-682 031.
BY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC .NO.829/2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEX A1 | COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 10/5/2010 IN WP(C)NO.12622 OF 2010. |
|---|---|
| ANNEX A2 | COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT. |
| ANNEX A3 | COPY OF THE LETTER NO.3373/11/S1 DATED 01/6/11 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. |
| RESPONDEN | T'S ANNEXURES: |
ANNEX R1 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 22/09/2010 GIVEN BY THIS RESPONDENT, TO THE PETITIONER.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO.JUDGE
sts
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
Contempt Case (C).No. 829 of 2011
==================
Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T
The petitioner complains of non compliance with the direction in Annexure A1 Judgment. The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Along with I.A.No.530/2011 filed by the respondent seeking exemption from personal appearance, the respondent has produced Annexure R1 order, which, according to the learned Government Pleader, is in compliance with Annexure A1 judgment. In the above circumstances, recording the same, this contempt case is closed.
sdk+
Sd/S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
P.K.MURALEEDHARAN KARTHA
C.THAMPI PAUL
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
