K.I.Ummer Khan v. Suraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner complained of the respondent's delay in complying with a prior High Court judgment directing assignment of an industrial plot. The Court held that the Government had forwarded the application with a favorable recommendation and found no violation, thus closing the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 675 of 2011(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27773/2010 Dated 07/09/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
K.I.UMMER KHAN, S/O.AYDROSE, AGED 60 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S.TRIOZ FABRICATORS, ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTIONS P.O.MUPPATHADOM, DA EDAYAR.
BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ
RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------
MR.SURAJ, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully delayed complying with a prior court order to pass orders on an industrial plot assignment application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.I.UMMER KHAN
- respondent
MR.SURAJ
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court