High Court at Ernakulam closed this contempt of court case as both sides agreed that directions from a previous writ judgment dated 10.12.2010 were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2011 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 51 of 2011(S) ----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.35305/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
------------------------SAYYED ULAMAM SHA, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.SAYYED HUSSAIN, KANDATHILPARAMBU, VELLAKINAR WARD, ALAPPUZHA. RETD. AS PEON, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY.
BY ADV. SMT.C.K.SHERIN
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
------------------------CYRIL VIMAL MENDEZ, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, ALAPPUZHA.
ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, M.C.,ALP FOR R
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S. Siri Jagan, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Cont. Case (C) No. 51 of 2011
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 6th day of April, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
Both sides agree that the directions in the judgment dated 10.12.2010 in W.P(C) No. 35305/2010 have been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.
Tds/
[TRUE COPY]
P.S TO JUDGE.
Sayed Ulamam Sha
Cyril Vimal Mendez
S. Siri Jagan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
