In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged a violation of prior directions. The court observed that the respondent had passed a subsequent order, leading to the closure of the contempt proceedings without further adjudication.
The Contempt Case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2011 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 360 of 2011(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30610/2010 Dated 20/10/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS
BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER
RESPONDENT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT
JAMES VARGHESE, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.SAJEEV
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
C.O.C.No.360 of 2011
Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2011
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioners alleging that the respondent did not comply with the directions contained in the judgment dated 20th October, 2010 in W.P.(C) No.30610 of 2010.
The Contempt Case is accordingly closed.
K.T.SANKARAN
csl
TOMY ANTONY
GEORGE MATHEW
JAMES VARGHESE
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
