Susamma Chandy v. Pradeep Kumar IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition non-compliance of judgments, the respondent cited a stay order from the last judgment. Court closed the case with potential to be reopened for violation of stay.
What did the court decide?
petitioner to reopen contingency if stay vacated appointment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2011 / 3RD SRAVANA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 223 of 2011(S)
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.25493/2002 Dated 30/08/2010
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE OP ----------------------------------------------------------SUSAMMA CHANDY, D/O.MATHAI CHANDI, AGED 37, SOONIYAPPALLY HOUSE, VENMAZHY, PANDANADU P.O., CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRADEEP KUMAR I.A.S., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUSAMMA CHANDY
- respondent
PRADEEP KUMAR I.A.S.
Coram
S.SIRI JAGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court