A contempt case filed for non-compliance with a previous judgment. The respondent's counsel informed the court that the petitioner's application was forwarded to the University via an order dated 21.10.2011. Consequently, the court closed the contempt case.
Case closed as the respondent had forwarded the petitioner's application to the University.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1156 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------IN W.P.(C) NO.27285 OF 2011 (I) .................
PETITIONER(S)/ PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------------
M.G.MANEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN CHETTIYAR, M.G.BHAVAN, KIDARAKUZHY, VENGANOOR P.O.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.S. SREEDHARAN PILLAI SMT.C.G. PREETHA SRI. T.K. SANDEEP SRI. ARJUN SREEDHAR SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE MULLAKKARIYIL
RESPONDENT(S) / 2ND RESPONDENT:
-----------------------------------------------------SHRI. MAZOOD HUSSAIN, PRINCIPAL, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), YOUNUS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VADAKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-10.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VPV
COCNO.1156/2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE-1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.10.2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 27285/2011. ANNEXURE-1I: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 20.10.2011. ANNEXURE-III: COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 27.10.2011.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
VPV
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 1156 OF 2011
Dated this the 29th day of November, 2011
J U D G M E N T
It is complaining of non-compliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment, this contempt case has been filed. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that by order dated 21.10.2011, the application of the petitioner was forwarded to the University. In the light of the said submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/[true copy] P.S. to Judge
M.G.MANEESH
SHRI. MAZOOD HUSSAIN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
