Allowed

C.B. Sreeraj and 2 Ors. v. State of Kerala and Another

Kerala HC22 Nov 2011Bail Appl./8093/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to three accused persons under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 498A and 34 IPC. The court imposed standard conditions including reporting requirements, interference with witnesses, and payment of bond.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; bail granted subject to bond of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties and specific conduct conditions.

C.B. Sreeraj and 2 Ors. Vs State of Kerala and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 8093 of 2011()

¶5

IN CRIME NO. 268/2011 OF KODUMON POLICE STATION

¶6

PETITIONERS(S): /ACCUSED

¶7

---------------------------------------

¶8

1. C.B.SREERAJ,AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN UNNITHAN,CHERIKKALETHU HOUSE, KODUMAN PANCHAYATH,KODUMAN VILLAGE,ADOOR TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶9

2. RADHAMANI KUNJAMMA,AGED 61 YEARS, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN UNNITHAN,CHERIKKALETHU HOUSE, KODUMAN PANCHAYATH,KODUMAN VILLAGE,ADOOR TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶10

3. C.B.SREELEKHA,W/O.LATE DILEEP, CHAKKATHRAYIL,XII/313 E,OMALOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶11

BY ADVS. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH

¶12

SRI. ZIYAD RAHMAN SRI. ROSHAN THOMAS SHIRAZ BAVA

¶13

RESPONDENT(S):

¶14

-------------------------

¶15

1. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.

¶16

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KODUMON POLICE STATION,KODUMON,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 691 555.

¶17

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K. RAJEEV

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

¶20

K.T.SANKARAN, J.

¶21

- - - - Bail Appl. NO.8093 OF 2011

¶22

- - - - Dated this the 22^nd day of November, 2011

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No.268 of 2011 of Kodumon Police Station.

¶25

The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 498A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

Accused No.1 is the husband of the defacto

¶27

complainant. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 are respectively the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the defacto complainant.

¶28

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶29

B.A.No.8093/2011

¶30

-2-

¶31

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release them on bail on their executing bond for 10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶32

a) The first petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Mondays, till the final report is filed or until further orders;

¶33

b) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶34

c) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

¶35

d) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

¶36

B.A.No.8093/2011

¶37

-3-

¶38

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶39

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

¶40

above.

¶41

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.

¶42

C.B. Sreeraj and 2 Ors. v. State of Kerala and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.B. Sreeraj and 2 Ors. v. State of Kerala and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Vs State of Kerala

Yadhun Gireesh Vs State of Kerala

S.R.Sreejith Kumar and Others Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Farooq and Others Vs State of Kerala

Akhil R.Ratheesh Vs State of Kerala

Rajan Vs State of Kerala