Allowed

D.Jayaraj v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC12 Aug 2011Bail Appl./5882/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under Section 498-A read with Section 34 IPC. The court directed the police to release them on execution of a bail bond for `10,000/- with two sureties, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail application allowed with a direction to release the petitioners on executing a bail bond of `10,000/- with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding interrogation, non-influence of witnesses,

D.Jayaraj Vs State of Kerala — Dowry and Cruelty | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5882 of 2011()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.405/2011 OF THIRUVALLOM POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3

¶8

¶9

D.JAYARAJ, S/O.DEVARAJAN,RAJ BHAVAN, KARUVATTA SOUTH,ADOOR PO, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.

¶10

DEVARAJAN,RAJ BHAVAN,KARUVATTA SOUTH, ADOOR PO, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.

¶11

VIJAYAMMA,W/O.DEVARAJAN, RAJ BHAVAN,KARUVATTA SOUTH, ADOOR PO, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE

¶13

RESPONDENTS: STATE

¶14

¶15

STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM 682 031

¶16

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLOM POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

¶17

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

K.T.SANKARAN, J.

¶20

Bail Appln.No.5882 of 2011

¶21

Dated this the 12^th day of August, 2011

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

¶24

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.405 of 2011 of Thiruvallom Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District.

¶25

The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

Accused No.1 is the husband of the de facto complainant. Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the father and mother of accused No.1.

¶27

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶28

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release them on bail on each of them executing

¶29

Bail Appln.No.5882/2011

¶30

: 2 :

¶31

bond for `10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶32

A) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶33

B) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence.

¶34

C) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

¶35

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶36

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶37

K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE

¶38

skj

D.Jayaraj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Jayaraj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Mohan and Another Vs State of Kerala

Santhosh Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Jermin John Vs State of Kerala

K.T.Gopinathan Vs State of Kerala

Rayees Vs State of Kerala

A.J.George Vs State of Kerala