Allowed

Vinod and Another v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC21 Jul 2011Bail Appl./5276/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was allowed to the petitioners, 1st and 2nd accused in a case involving offences under Sections 498A and 34 IPC. The order imposed conditions including appearance for interrogation and restriction on influencing witnesses or committing offences.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties and complying with conditions regarding investigation, witness conduct, and non-commitment of offences.

Vinod and Another Vs State of Kerala — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5276 of 2011()

¶6

----------------------------------------CRIME NO.1693/2011 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ------------------------------

¶7

PETITONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 & 2

¶8

--------------------------------------------------

¶9

1. VINOD.B,AGED 34 YEARS,VINOD BHAVAN, PARAYILKKAVU,NEDUNGOLAM,KOLLAM.

¶10

2. PADMINI,AGED 55 YEARS,W/O.BALAKRISHNAN, VINOD BHAVAN,PARAYILKKAVU,NEDUNGOLAM,KOLLAM.

¶11

BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU. S

¶12

RESPONDENT(S): STATE

¶13

-------------------------------------

¶14

STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

sts

¶18

K.T.SANKARAN, J .

¶19

--------------------------------B.A. No.5276 OF 2011

¶20

Dated this the 21^st day of July, 2011

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Petitioners are the 1^st and 2^nd accused in Crime No.1693 of 2011 of the Aluva Police Station.

¶23

The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 498A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

The defacto complainant filed a complaint before the Magistrate's Court, which was forwarded to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, a crime was registered. The 1^st petitioner is the husband and the 2^nd petitioner is the motherin-law of the defacto complainant.

¶25

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶26

B.A. No.5276 OF 2011 2

¶27

the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶28

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence, the injury sustained and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release them on bail on their executing bond for `10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶29

A) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶30

B) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence.

¶31

C) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

¶32

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶33

B.A. No.5276 OF 2011

¶34

¶35

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

¶36

above.

¶37

K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE .

¶38

cms

Vinod and Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod and Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dittomon Alias Pappachan and Another Vs the State and Another

George Kutty Vs State of Kerala

Sekh Saraffaizudin @ Sarpharaj Vs State of Kerala

Binu P.M. and Another Vs the State of Kerala

Berlin @ Selvin Vs State of Kerala

Haseem Vs State of Kerala