Ramesh A.S. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam briefly addressed a bail application by a suspect who was not yet arrayed as an accused. The court accepted the prosecutor's view that the apprehension of arrest was unfounded. The petition was closed with the instruction that any future interrogation must be accompanied by notice under S. 160 Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 4673 of 2011() ----------------------------CRIME NO.213/2011 OF PUTHENKURIZ POLICE STATION
PETITIONER:ACCUSED
RAMESH A.S., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, AKKATTU SREE VIHAR, KAITHAKKATTU KARA, PATTIMATTOM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT
-------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail when the petitioner is only a suspect and not yet arrayed as an accused.
Whether the apprehension of arrest is unfounded given the procedural status of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
RAMESH A.S.
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court