The High Court of Kerala dismissed a bail application seeking anticipatory bail. The court directed the petitioner to surrender for police interrogation before granting any bail, citing specific parameters from a Supreme Court precedent.
Rejection of anticipatory bail; direction to surrender for interrogation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 4249 of 2011() ----------------------------CRMP.1540/2011 of DISTRICT COURT, KOTTAYAM CRIME NO.29/2011 OF RAMANKARY POLICE STATION ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER:ACCUSED
ANISH KUMAR.B,S/O.BHASKARAN, AGED 26 YEARS, PARAYIL PUTHUPARAMBU, KADAMANCHIRA, THRIKODITHANAM,
BY ADV. SRI.VISHNU SOMAN
RESPONDENTS:
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No.4249 of 2011
Dated this the 08th day of June, 2011
ORDER
Petitioner, who is accused No.3 in Crime No.29 of 2011 of Ramankary Police Station, Alappuzha, for offences punishable under Sections 380 & 457 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.
Bail Appln.No.4249/2011
: 2 :
the prosecution as well, consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.
In case the petitioner while surrendering before the Investigating Officer has deprived the investigating officer sufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete the interrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as above and submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or the Court concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court also will not be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficient time was not available after the production or appearance of the petitioner.
This petition is disposed of as above. Dated this the 08th day of June, 2011.
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
skj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who is an accused in an IPC offence involving theft.
Whether the petitioner must surrender for interrogation before regular bail can be considered.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and OthersExplained¶20
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2011) 1 SCC 694 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Anish Kumar.B
State of Kerala
V. RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
