Petitioners sought anticipatory bail alleging threat of arrest for non-bailable offences. The Court noted no crime was registered per the Prosecutor and closed the petition without granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2011 / 6TH ASHADHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 4246 of 2011()
PETITIONERS
BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER
SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S): STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No.4246 of 2011
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated this the 27th day of June, 2011**
ORDER
Petitioners seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Kasaragod Police are at their heels on an allegation of commission of non-bailable offences.
Recording the submission made by the Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed.
Dated this the 27th day of June, 2011.
V. RAMKUMAR,
(JUDGE)
sj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have a valid apprehension of arrest warranting anticipatory bail given no FIR was registered.
Laxman Prabu and others
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
