Allowed

Basil Joy v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC25 Jan 2011Bail Appl./414/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice V. Ramkumar granted bail to the petitioner, an accused in a cheating and forgery case. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond with sureties and comply with reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with effect from 01/02/2011 on executing a bond Rs. 15,000/- with two solvent sureties each for Rs. 15,000/- and complying with specified conditions.

Basil Joy Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 414 of 2011() --------------------------------

¶4

(CRIME NO. 2455/2010 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION)

¶5

PETITIONER --------------BASIL JOY, S/O. JOY, AGED 21 YEARS, ATHIRAMPUZHA HOUSE, VENGOOR, NEAR PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶6

BY ADV. SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE

¶7

RESPONDENT(S): --------------------STATE OF KERALA, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶8

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE

¶9

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶10

svs

¶11

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶12

Bail Application No.414 of 2011

¶13

Dated this the 25^th day of January, 2011

¶14

ORDER

¶15

In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is accused No.7 in Crime No.2455 of 2010 of Aluva Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 365 & 395 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 22/12/2010.

¶16

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶17

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 01/02/2011 on his executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

¶18

Bail Appln.No.414/2011

¶19

-2-

¶20

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶21

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶22

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶23

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶24

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

¶25

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶26

skj

Basil Joy v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basil Joy v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S.E.Board Vs Kalliyani

K.S.E.B. Vs Souja

K.P.Prabhakaran Vs Ooramkunnummal Chandran

Karthiyayani Vs Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

Bettlal Paul & Another Vs P.S.Joseph & Another

Sree Kalleli Oorali Appoppan Kavu Seva Vs v.S.Vasu and Others