K.Krishnan Nair v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
A bail application seeking anticipatory bail was closed by the Court after the Public Prosecutor submitted that no crime had been registered and the petitioners were not wanted.
A bail application seeking anticipatory bail was closed by the Court after the Public Prosecutor submitted that no crime had been registered and the petitioners were not wanted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 3891 of 2011() -----------------------------
PETITIONER
BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING STATION HOUSE OFFICE, CHALISSERY POLICE STATION, CHALISSERY-679536, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Bail Application No.3891 of 2011
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011**
ORDER
Petitioners seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Chalissery Police are at their heels on an allegation of commission of non-bailable offences.
Recording the submission made by the Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed.
Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011.
V. RAMKUMAR,
(JUDGE)
sj
K. KRISHNAN NAIR
K. SAROJINI
COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA
V. RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court