Allowed

Hydrose v. State

Kerala HC6 Jun 2011Bail Appl./3855/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who was the second accused in a criminal case. The court applied the factors laid down in the Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre case and imposed conditions for bail, including regular reporting and compliance with legal provisions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail for Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each of the like amount, subject to conditions regarding reporting, interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. The bail i

Hydrose Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2011 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 3855 of 2011() -----------------------CRIME NO. 24 OF 2011 OF MUKKAM POLICE STATION

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2

¶7

¶8

HYDROSE,S/O.MOHAMMED,AGED 60 YEARS, KOLANGATU PARAMBIL HOUSE,P.O,EDATHIRINJI, EDATHIRINJI VILLAGE,MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD

¶10

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶11

¶12

STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SUBINSPECTORO OF POLICE,MUKKAM POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶16

Bail Application No. 3855 of 2011

¶17

Dated: 06-06-2011

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 24 of 2011 of Mukkam Police Station, Thrissur District for an offence punishable under Sec. 498 A I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶21

After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930),, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for ` 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: -

¶22

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶23

Bail A.No. 3855 of 2011 -:2:-

¶24

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶25

Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶26

Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶27

The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra).

¶28

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶29

This application is allowed as above.

¶30

Dated this the 6th day of June, 2011.

¶31

ani/

¶32

/true copy/

Hydrose v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hydrose v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mavin Kumar T.M. Vs State of Kerala

Nazar Vs State of Kerala

Franco C Vs State of Kerala

Praveesh C Vs State of Kerala

Noble.T.F Vs State

Selestian Vs State of Kerala