Allowed

P.Manoj v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Jun 2011Bail Appl./3824/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court allowed a bail application filed by P.Manoj accused under Section 55 of the Abkari Act for possession of IMFL, granting bail subject to specific conditions including appearance before the IO and not influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail w.e.f. 14.06.2011 on executing a bond for `35,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount.

P.Manoj Vs State of Kerala — Corruption | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3824 of 2011() ----------------------------CRIME NO.318/2011 OF KASABA POLICE STATION CMP.1040/2011 of J.M.F.C.-III,KOZHIKODE ....................

¶4

PETITIONER: -------------P.MANOJ, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY (LATE), AGED 36 YEARS, THARAMMEL HOUSE, MANKAVU PO, VALAYANAD AMSOM, KOZHIKODE

¶5

BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

¶6

RESPONDENT(S): ----------------STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASABA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶7

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL

¶8

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶9

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No.3824 of 2011

¶11

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶12

DATED: 07.06.2011

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.318/2011 of Kasaba Police Station, Kozhikode for offences punishable under Secs.55(a) and (i) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 32.5 litres IMFL, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 07.05.2011.

¶15

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶16

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail w.e.f. 14.06.2011 on his executing a bond for `35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and subject to the following conditions: -

¶17

B.A.No.3824/2011

¶18

-:2:-

¶19

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays until the final report is filed.

¶20

2. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the court or to the police or to any other person in authority.

¶21

3. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶22

4. The petitioner shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case.

¶23

5. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses or the victims nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶24

6. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶25

7. The petitioner shall notify to the Court his place of residence before executing the bail bond.

¶26

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶27

This application is allowed as above.

¶28

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶29

P.Manoj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Manoj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveesh C Vs State of Kerala

Noble.T.F Vs State

Selestian Vs State of Kerala

Unnikrishnan Vs State of Kerala

Ushendramani Vs State of Kerala

Ademola Adebayo Vs State of Kerala