Baiju v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application in an NDPS case involving possession of ganja was dismissed because the court was not satisfied that the statutory conditions justifying bail were present.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed; petitioner not released.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3806 of 2011() ----------------------------CRMP.582/2011 of D.C & SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM NDPS CR NO.3/2011 OF KAZHAKKUTTOM EXCISE RANGE ....................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ------------------------BAIJU, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. BABU, HOUSE NO.207, THOPIL VEEDU, NEAR KACHERI P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY EXCISE INSPECTOR, KAZHAKKUTTOM EXCISE RANGE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
----------------------------------------------Bail Appln.No.3806 of 2011
Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner satisfies the stringent conditions under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act for grant of bail.
Whether possession of 23 Kgs. of ganja justifies denial of bail under the NDPS Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BAIJU
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court