Disposed

Khadeeja v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 Jun 2011Bail Appl./3435/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner, accused in a criminal case, was considered. The court granted bail from June 13, 2011, subject to specific conditions including reporting to the investigating officer and refraining from influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail w.e.f. 13-06-2011 on bond with sureties subject to conditions.

Khadeeja Vs the State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 3435 of 2011() -----------------------CRIME NO. 346/2011 OF PARAVUR POLICE STATION

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶7

¶8

KHADEEJA, W/O.ABDU, AGED 50 YEARS, PUTHENKOTTACKAL RAMARATH VEEDU, CHEMBUKADAMBU KARA, KODAMCHERRY VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB

¶10

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶11

¶12

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶16

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No. 3435 of 2011

¶17

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATE: 10-06-2011

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is the 8^th accused in Crime No. 346 of 2011 of Paravoor Police Station, Ernakulam District seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 15-03-2011.

¶20

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶21

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but only from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail w.e.f.13-06-2011 on the petitioner executing a bond for ` 15,000/(Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and subject to the following conditions:

¶22

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.

¶23

2. Except for the purpose of complying with Condition No.1, the petitioner shall not enter the limits of Paravoor Police Station, Court concerned.

¶24

B.A. No. 3435 of 2011

¶25

3. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the Court or to the police or to any other person in authority.

¶26

4. The petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶27

5. The petitioner shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case.

¶28

6. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses or the victims nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶29

7. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶30

8. The petitioner shall notify to the Court his place of residence before executing the bail bond.

¶31

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to her shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶32

This application is allowed as above.

¶33

Dated this the 10^th June, 2011.

¶34

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶35

ani/

Khadeeja v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khadeeja v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binu Vs State of Kerala

Akhil Raj Vs Sub Inspector of Police, Kundara.

Prasanth Vs State of Kerala

Reeja P Vs Sub Inspector of Police,Malappuram

Vijeesh.M.P and Others Vs State of Kerala

Santhosh Nair Vs State