Mujeeb v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed the bail application of Accused No. 22 in a case involving offences under Sections 366A, 354, 376 IPC. Bail was granted from May 17, 2011, subject to conditions including reporting to the Investigating Officer and restrictions on contact with witnesses.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail w.e.f. 17.05.2011 on bond of Rs. 15,000 with two solvent sureties subject to reporting and non-tampering conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD MAY 2011 / 13TH VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3270 of 2011() ----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.2675/2010 Dated 07/04/2010 .................... (CRIME NO.346/2011 OF NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT)
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.22: -------------------------------------------MUJEEB, S/O MUHAMED, AGED 26 YEARS, MANNARATH HOUSE, ERUMATHALAKARA, KEEZHAMADU VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIIK
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B. A. No. 3270 of 2011
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is accused in offences under Sections 366A, 354, 376, and others.
Whether conditions to ensure surrender to police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses should be imposed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUJEEB, S/O MUHAMED
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court