Allowed

Sajeev v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 May 2011Bail Appl./2965/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted bail to three accused persons charged with murder, grievous hurt, and other offenses under the IPC. The court imposed specific conditions regarding bonds, appearances, and travel restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to execution of bond with two sureties, periodic appearance for interrogation, and other conditions including restrictions on leaving jurisdiction.

Sajeev Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2965 of 2011()

¶6

---------------------------------------

¶7

CRIME NO.213/2011 OF SOORANAD POLICE STATION

¶8

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1, 3 & 8

¶9

---------------------------------------------------

¶10

1. SAJEEV, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, AGED 33, SABEENA MANZILIL FROM NELLUVILA THAZHE THUNDIL VEEDU, KAMPALADI MURI, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE.

¶11

2. SUNEER @ ADAPPU, S/O.ABDUL SALAM, AGED 23, NELLUVILA THAZHE THUNDIL VEEDU, KAMPALADI MURI, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE.

¶12

3. SUBERKUTTY, S/O.HYDROS KUNJU, AGED 44, NELLUVILA THAZHE THUNDIL VEEDU, KAMPALADI MURI, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE.

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMMED

¶14

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶15

-------------------------------------------------

¶16

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMCOTTA (CRIME NO.213/2011), SOORANAD POLICE STATION, SOORANAD REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶17

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

tss

¶20

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

¶21

BA No.2965 of 2011

¶22

Dated this the 10^th day of May 2011

¶23

Order

¶24

This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the

¶25

Criminal Procedure Code, seeking bail.

¶26

The petitioners are accused in Crime No.213/11 of Sooranad Police Station for the offences punishable under Ss.143, 144, 147, 148, 114, 324, 341, 302, 326 r/w 149 IPC. The accused were alleged to have formed themselves into an unlawful assembly with deadly weapons like iron rod and wooden pieces and brutally manhandled the de facto complainant and he sustained grievous hurt. They also murdered the brother of the de facto complainant by inflicting injury on his head. The accused have been in judicial custody from 11.03.2011. Considering the period of incarceration already undergone by the accused and the unlikelyhood of trial concluding in the near future and in view of the submission made on behalf of the accused that they

¶27

BA 2965/11

¶28

¶29

will abide by any condition that may be imposed on them, the accused are granted bail subject to the following conditions:

¶30

The accused shall execute a bond for Rs.2,00,000/(Rupees Two Lakhs only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of JFCM-I, Sasthamcotta. If in case the learned Magistrate has doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties.

¶31

The accused shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer and they should appear before the investigating officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM for a period of three months from today.

¶32

The accused shall produce their original passports before the learned Magistrate. If they are not having

¶33

BA 2965/11

¶34

¶35

any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the learned Magistrate .

¶36

The accused will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and that they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶37

The accused and the sureties shall not leave the jurisdiction of the JFCM-1, Sasthamcotta without the prior permission of the learned learned Magistrate .

¶38

The learned learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the accused and the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity card/Driving licence etc.

¶39

Petitioners will furnish the correct residential

¶40

BA 2965/11 4

¶41

address and should also make available land phone number/mobile number or contact number. The petitioners shall not shift their residence without intimating the Investigating Officer and the learned learned Magistrate.

¶42

N.K.Balakrishnan, Judge

¶43

sta

¶44

BA 2965/11 5

Sajeev v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajeev v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asha Paulson Vs State of Kerala

Asha Paulson Vs State of Kerala

Asha Paulson Vs State of Kerala

Hamza K .P Vs State of Kerala

Sadik Vs State of Kerala

Abdul Hakeem Vs State of Kerala