Allowed

Prabhu v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 Mar 2011Bail Appl./1890/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, granting bail to an accused charged with murder and grievous hurt, dismissed the state's opposition and directed release upon execution of a bond with sureties under conditions restricting contact and location.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail effective 21.03.2011 by executing a bond of Rs.15,000 with two solvent sureties, subject to specific conditions.

Prabhu Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1890 of 2011()

¶6

----------------------------CMP.45/2011 of J.M.F.C.-II, PEERUMEDU CRIME No.1009/10 OF KUMILY POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED :-

¶8

-----------------------------------

¶9

PRABHU, S/O.RAJAN, KANDATHIL HOUSE ATTAPPALAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :-

¶12

------------------------------------------------

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SHO KUMILY, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.M.S.BREEZE

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

jvt

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶18

Bail Application No. 1890 of 2011

¶19

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶20

DATE: 15.03.2011

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

In this Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.1009/2010 of Kumily Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 302 and 324 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 27.12.2010.

¶23

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail w.e.f 21.03.2011 on his executing a bond for Rs.15,000/(Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:

¶25

1. The petitioner shall report before the Dy.S.P, Kattappana between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.

¶26

2. The petitioner shall not enter the limits of Kumily Police Station until further orders are passed by the Court concerned.

¶27

Bail Application No. 1890 of 2011

¶28

¶29

3. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the Court or to the police or to any other person in authority .

¶30

4. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶31

5. The petitioner shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case.

¶32

6. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses or the victims nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶33

7. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶34

8. The petitioner shall notify to the Court his place of residence before executing the bail bond.

¶35

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶36

This application is allowed as above.

¶37

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶38

dmb

Prabhu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.J.Krishnan and Another Vs Managing Committee, Erattakulangara

P.a.Hamsa Vs the Dist. Registrar General

Akru @ Vipin Vs State of Kerala

M/S.Pragathi Rubber Mills Vs M/S.Paragon Rubber Industries

Shaik Vs Melachetta Mohammedkoya

V.Kunhi Mohamed & Others Vs the State of Kerala & Others