Shanavas v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused anticipatory bail to five accused in domestic violence cases, directing them to surrender for police interrogation before applying for regular bail, with conditional release granted upon compliance.
What did the court decide?
Directing petitioners to surrender for interrogation on 21/03/2011 or 22/03/2011, with conditional bail granted subject to police interrogation and execution of bond with sureties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2011 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 1692 of 2011()
CRIME NO. 171/2011 OF MALA POLICE STATION
PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 5 :
-------------------------------------------------
1. SHANAVAS, S/O.SULAIMAN,PICHATHARA PUTHENCHIRA VILLAGE, MUKUNADAPURAM TALUK.
2. SUBAIDA SULAIMAN, W/O.SULAIMAN, PICHATHARA PUTHENCHIRA VILLAGE, MUKUNADAPURAM TALUK.
3. SHAHITHA, W/O.EDAPPILLY JALEEL, ALAVI CENTRE DESOM, POTTA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted given that the investigating officer has not interrogated the petitioners.
What procedure should be followed to permit interrogation and subsequent bail for the petitioners.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHANAVAS
- petitioner
SUBAIDA SULAIMAN
- petitioner
SHAHITHA
- petitioner
RASHID
- petitioner
JAMEELA BADARUDHEEN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court