Allowed

Shaiju.K and Another v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Mar 2011Bail Appl./1664/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted bail to accused Nos. 1 and 2 in a case under the Kerala Forest Act. The court imposed conditions including periodic reporting to the Investigating Officer, availability for interrogation, and non-influence of witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail effective 18/03/2011 by executing a bond for Rs. 15,000 with two solvent sureties each for the like amount.

Shaiju.K and Another Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1664 of 2011()

¶6

OR NO. 2/2011 OF VAZHANI FOREST STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 :

¶8

-----------------------------------------------

¶9

1. SHAIJU K, S/O.KITTAPPAN, NANDANATH (H), NELLAPPALLY.

¶10

2. SANAL, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN, KAITHAVALAPPIL (H), CHERTHALA SOUTH VILLAGE.

¶11

BY ADV. SRI. S. RAJEEV

¶12

RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT :

¶13

-----------------------------------------------

¶14

STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (OR NO.2/2011 OF VAZHANI FOREST STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT).

¶15

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

¶18

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶19

Bail Application No.1664 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 7^th day of March, 2011

¶20

ORDER

¶21

In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 & 2 in O.R.No.2 of 2011 of Vazhani Forest Station for an offence punishable under Section 27(1)(e)(iv) of Kerala Forest Act, seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 22/02/2011.

¶22

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶23

Having regard to the nature of the offence, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioners, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail with effect from 18/03/2011 on each of them executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

¶24

Bail Appln.No.1664/2011

¶25

: 2 :

¶26

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.

¶27

2. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶28

3. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶29

4. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶30

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶31

This application is allowed as above.

¶32

Dated this the 7^th day of March, 2011.

¶33

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶34

skj

Shaiju.K and Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaiju.K and Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thomas Issac and Others Vs the State of Kerala

E.K.Ummar Vs State of Kerala,Rep;by P.Prosecutor

Geevan-Jo-Dharsan Vs State of Kerala

Bindu Thomas Vs v.Subramani

K.K.Reejabai Vs a.P.M.Mohammed Haneesh

Podiyan.S Vs Achenkunnu