Sindhu v. South Central Railway & Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition closed as the amount due under the impugned order was subsequently paid by respondents. No substantive decision recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
WP(C).No. 34046 of 2010(E)
----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
SINDHU, W/O.LATE SURESH KUMAR, AGED 38, SAYOOJYAM, KUZHIYAM SOUTH, CHANDANA THOPPU.P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD, CHENNAI-3.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI-3.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.C.CHERIAN, SR. SC., RAILWAYS
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
W.P.(C) NO. 34046 OF 2010
=====================
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the amount due in pursuance to Ext.P1 order, which was confirmed by Ext.P2 in appeal, has been paid.
Therefore, the writ petition is closed.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
SINDHU, W/O.LATE SURESH KUMAR
GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court