U.v.Thomas v. P.P.Augusty
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Court dismissed the Writ Appeal dated 18 Oct 2010 for non-prosecution as the appellant representative had no instructions and no process was paid despite notice ordering process.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2010 / 26TH ASWINA 1932
WA.No. 1539 of 1999(D)
--------------------------AGAINST JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.7343/1999-Y DATED 25.5.1999
APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT:
U.V.THOMAS, S/O.VAREED, UDHINIPARAMBAN HOUSE, P.O.ELENJIPARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1,2 & 4:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
U.VThomas
- respondent
P.P.Augusty
- respondent
V.C.Jose
- respondent
Kerala State Election Commission
- respondent
Block Development Officer, Chalakudy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court