Alphonsa @ Alphy v. Pylee
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeals were dismissed as the respondents (including the sole respondent) died and the appellant failed to implead legal representatives, though the matter was later reported as settled outside court.
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931
SA.No. 832 of 1995()
-------------------AS.65/1994 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM OS.136/1992 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
ALPHONSE @ ALPHY, S/O.THOMAS, PALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KOCHI 682 020.
BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS ANTONY KALLENPALLY SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
PYLEE, S/O.PYLEE, MUKKADAYIL HOUSE, PALATHURUTHU DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KOCHI 682 020. (DIED)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alphose @ Alphy
- respondent
Pylee
Coram
Thomas P. Joseph
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court