Ramakrishnan v. Rajan @ Unni
Case brief
What is this about?
In this appeal, the High Court of Kerala dismissed the appeal against an order of the lower appellate court which had dismissed a suit for recovery of Rs.9,000. (Total character count: 149)
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932
SA.No. 260 of 1997(E) -----------------------------(AS.NO.27/1994 OF SUB COURT, QUILANDY, OS.NO.159/1991 OF MUNSIFF COURT, QUILANDY)
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------------------------------------------------
RAMAKRISHNAN, KALLATT HOUSE, PUTHOORVATTAM AMSOM, DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK.
BY ADV. R.PARTHASARATHY.
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
-----------------------------------------------------------
RAJAN ALIAS UNNI, MEETHALA CHERIYALA HOUSE, NIRMALLUR AMSOM, DESOM, QUILANDY TALUK.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower appellate court was justified in holding that the promissory note was invalid and dismissing the suit.
Whether the evidence [paragraph number not available in text]
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramakrishnan
- respondent
Rajan Alias Unni
Coram
P Bhavadasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court