C.Mani v. R.Raji
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the second appeal confirming the lower court's decree. The appellant failed to establish rights to the property under Section 53A. The appeal was dismissed with a conditional order granting the appellant four months to vacate.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed confirming lower court's judgment and decree; appellant granted four months to vacate property unconditionally.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2010 / 16TH ASHADHA 1932 RSA.No. 623 of 2010() --------------------AS.118/2006 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD OS.228/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR ....................
APPELLANT:APPELLANT:DEFENDANT:
-----------------------------------------------------------
C.MANI, S/O.CHAMI, RESIDING AT AYYANPUDUR, CHITTUR P.O., CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON, SRI.JIBU P THOMAS, SRI.P.S.APPU, SRI.A.R.NIMOD, SRI.C.A.ANOOP.
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:PLAINTIFF:
------------------------------------------------------------------
R.RAJI, W/O.SUBRAMANIAN, RESIDING AT `SUBHASH NIVAS', AYYANPUDUR, CHITTUR P.O., CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the defendant entitled to protection of Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act.
Whether dispute within four months can be conclusively resolved without passing final decree.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.MANI
- respondent
R.RAJI
Coram
P.BHAVADASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court