Regular second appeal dismissed as the appellants, having proposed an out-of-court settlement representation pending before the respondent Board, did not press the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellants did not press it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 2ND ASWINA 1932
RSA.NO. 146 OF 2010()
{IN A.S.NO.9/2002 OF THE ADDL.DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), MAVELIKKARA IN OS.307/1996 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MAVELIKKARA}
APPELLANTS(S): APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS 2-3
S/O. R.JANARDHANA IYER, DO-DO-
BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH
SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS
RSA.NO. 146 OF 2010 :: 2 ::
R1 TO R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
---------------------------------------
R.S.A.No.146 of 2010
--------------------------------------Dated this the 24th day of September, 2010
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that an out of court settlement over the dispute covered by the litigation is now being attempted to by presenting a representation before the Travancore Devaswaom Board and such representation is pending consideration. In view
of the above submission, it is submitted that the appeal is not pressed. Appeal dismissed.
Sd/(S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE
sk/-
//true copy//
P.S. To Judge.
Smt. R. Seethammal & Ors.
Sub Group Officer, Travancore Devaswom Board & Ors.
S.S. Satheesachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
