Parukutty v. Ravunni
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed. Court held appellants estopped from challenging concurrent decree for recovery of possession after voluntarily agreeing to surrender vacant possession during execution proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 22ND BHADRA 1932 RSA.No. 1193 of 2009(A) ----------------------AS.69/1998 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM OS.288/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM .................... APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6
- PARUKUTTY,W/O.NARAYANAN, KARALMANNA AMSOM,THEKKUMMURI DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- VIJAYALAKSHMI,D/O.NARAYANAN, KARALMANNA AMSOM,THEKKUMMURI DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- GOPALAKRISHNAN,S/O.NARAYANAN, KARALMANNA AMSOM,THEKKUMMURI DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- SATHEESH BABU,S/O.NARAYANAN, KARALMANNA AMSOM,THEKKUMMURI DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- VIJAYAKUMARI,D/O.NARAYANAN, KARALMANNA AMSOM,THEKKUMMURI DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.P.K.THASLEENA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Parukutty
- appellant
Vijyalakshmi
- appellant
Gopala Kishnan
- appellant
Satheesh Babu
- appellant
Vijayakumari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court