One of the substantial questions of law urged for a decision is whether transfer of right of easement which should run with the dominant tenement to the servient owner is hit by Section 6(c) of the Transfer of Property Act (for short, “the Act”)?Second Appeal arises from judgment and decree of learned Sub Judge, Ottapalam in A.S.No.55 of 2000 confirming judgment and decree of learned Munsiff-Magistrate, Pattambi in O.S.No.99 of 1994. Appellant filed the suit seeking a declaration of his right of easement to draw water from plaint B schedule belonging to the respondents for the beneficial enjoyment of plaint A schedule belonging to him and in case Ext.B6, registered document dated 27.8.1990 is found to be in any way interfering with that right of his, for a declaration that the said document is void and for injunction to restrain respondents from interfering with his right of easement. According to the appellant, respondents obstructed his right of enjoyment of easement in the year, 1984 following which he filed O.S.No.64 of 1984 to establish his right and got a favourable decree which was confirmed in A.S.No.136 of 1985. Later appellant filed E.P.No.3 of 1990 for restoration of water chal to the plaint A schedule. At that time he was summoned to the police station where he was coerced to enter into an agreement with the respondents and to execute a document at the office of the Sub Registrar. It is accordingly that Ext.B6
