The High Court of Kerala allowed a review petition. The original judgment had dismissed a writ petition based on non-payment. The reviewing judge found the dismissal factually incorrect as the petitioner had proved payment of 2 lakhs, thus recalling the impugned order.
Review petition allowed and impugned judgment recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
RP.No. 1115 of 2010(J)
---------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34299/2010 DATED 23/11/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
SARANKUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE P.GOVINDA PANICKAR, 'SAROJAM', DESIYA KAVALA ROAD, THRIKKAKARA P.O., VAZHAKALA.
BY ADV. SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN, SMT.LEKSHMI SWAMINATHAN.
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------
1. SECRETARY, GRATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COCHIN-682 020.
2. THE CHAIRMAN, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COCHIN-682 020.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC, GCDA
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
R.P No.1115 of 2010 in W.P (C) No.34299 of 2010
Dated this the 17th December, 2010
O R D E R
The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 23rd November 2010. One of the reasons stated in the judgment was that after 2004 petitioner has not made any payment to the GCDA.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ma
/True copy/ P.A to Judge
2
ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
ma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition decision was factually incorrect regarding payment of 2 lakhs requiring a review?
SARANKUMAR
SECRETARY, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CHAIRMAN, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
