Dismissed
Rajappan v. Abraham
Kerala HCRCRev./398/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2010 / 25TH SRAVANA 1932
RCRev..No. 398 of 2004(C) -----------------------RCA.19/2003 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,KOTTAYAM RCP.17/2001 of MUNSIFF COURT, VAIKOM
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/COUNTER PETITIONER:
RAJAPPAN, THATTAPPARAMBIL, CHEMBU VILLAGE, CHEMBOOKARA, VAIKOM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER (LANDLORD): -------------------
ABRAHAM, AYYANAMBARAMBIL VEETTIL, KULASEKHARA MANGALAM VILLAGE AND KARA, VAIKOM TALUK.
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2010 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
----------------------------------
R.C.R. No.398 of 2004
Dated this the 16th day of August, 2010
O R D E R
Pius C.Kuriakose,J.
No representation for the revision petitioner. But we have every reason to assume that the issue has become infructuous. The revision is filed by the tenant and this court never became inclined to grant stay of execution. In all probability execution has proceeded and revision petitioner has been evicted. We close the RCR on that basis.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb
Rajappan
Abraham
Pius C.Kuriakose
C.K.Abdul Rehim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court