been entered on the basis of correct evaluation of the evidence which consisted inter alia of Ext.C1 commission report, inspiring oral evidence of PW1 and even the evidence of RW1, the present tenant. Under Ext.C1, the commissioner reported that the room in question was practically empty but for waste materials. The report did suggest that the room was not in use for storage of any stock in trade as claimed by the tenant. The report further shows that the veranda of the room was full of cobwebs and termites and that even in shutters termites were seen. The conclusion of the learned appellate authority that Ext. C1 suggested non occupation of the tenant at the tenanted premises for a considerable long period, in our view is reasonable. The total absence of documents including the availability of a trade licence by the tenant(who had a licence earlier) is another circumstance relied on by the appellate authority to come to the conclusion that there is cessation of occupation without reasonable cause. As noticed by the appellate authority, if as a matter of fact, the claim of the tenant that he was conducting business in the premises was correct, there would have been some documents. Total absence
