K.C.Pappachan v. Director General, New Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner appeared by counsel but was absent; the court dismissed the original petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932
OP.No. 9525 of 2003(H)
PETITIONER(S):
K.C.PAPPACHAN, EX-CONSTABLE NO.680050467 (C.R.P.F.), KAKKASSERY HOUSE, EAST BAZAR, PAZHANJI P.O.L, THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
ADV.IBRAHIM KHAN,A.S.G.
ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 TO 3 SRI.S.R.AJITH, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1TO3
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 7.4.2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
O.P.No. 9525 of 2003
==================
Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner and counsel are absent. Dismissed for default.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
O.P.No. 9525 of 2003-H
==================
J U D G M E N T
7th April, 2010
K.C. Pappachan
Director General, Pay and Accounts Office, C.R.P.F., Mahavir Nagar, New Delhi
The Additional; D.I.G.P., Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Hyderabad
Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Government of India, Department of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare, New Delhi
S. Siri Jagan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court