sanctioning leave. In view of the said contention it was for the petitioners to have satisfied this court that the grant of leave without allowance was without any condition as specified in Ext.P1. In this writ petition petitioners have not produced the orders granting them leave without allowance and therefore this court is not in a position to conclude that there is no condition in the order granting leave to them. In so far as Ext.P4 relied on by the petitioners is concerned, a reading of Ext.P4 itself shows that the order sanctioning leave to the beneficiary of the said order did not contain any condition, that the period will not be reckoned as qualifying service. It was therefore that by Ext.P4 the benefit was granted. Since the petitioners have not established that the grant of leave without allowance was without any condition, this court is not in a position to grant any relief to them.