C.D.Jose v. Joseph P.R.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held the original petition infructuous and dismissed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The original petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932
OP.No. 14877 of 2003(U)
-----------------------------------PETITIONER(S):
------------------------1. C.D.JOSE, S/O. DEVASSY, AGED 44, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, ANTHIKKAD P.O., TRICHUR - 680 641.
2. P.J.LILLY, AGED 35, W/O. C.D.JOSE OF -DO- -DO-
BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI
RESPONDENT(S):
- --------------------------1. JOSEPH P.R., S/O. RAPPAI, PUNNANGADAN HOUSE, THOLUR VILLAGE AND DESOM, TRICHUR TALUK.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION, ANTHIKKAD P.O., TRICHUR DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.D.JOSE
- respondent
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION
Coram
S.SIRI JAGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court