A.B.Sajitha v. Abdul Khader.M.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 701 of 2008() ---------------------------OP.240/2007 of FAMILY COURT, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANTS:PETITIONER(S):
---------------------------------------------1. A.B.SAJITHA, 35 YEARS, D/O.ABDULLA, KALPPADU HOUSE, VELLAPPU ROAD, THRIKKARIPUR, NORTH THRIKKARIPUR VILLAGE,KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2. SAJEER.A.B., S/O.A.B.SAJITHA, AGED 16 YEARS, KALPPADU HOUSE, VELLAPPU ROAD,THRIKKARIPUR NORTH THRIKKARIPUR VILLAGE,KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
3. SHAMILA.A.B., D/O.A.B.SAJITHA AGED A11 YEARS (THE PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. THE PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER, LEGAL GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND-THE 1ST PETITIONER) BY ADVS. SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN, SRI.S.SUJIN, SRI.V.JOHN MANI.
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------------ABDULKHADER.M., 41 YEARS, S/O.U.K.P.ABDULLA, NEAR JUMA MASJID, ELAMBACHI PO., SOUTH TRIKARIPUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2010 ALONG WITH MA NO. 812 OF 2009 AND RPFC NO. 386 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
I.A.No.3250/2010 in MAT Appeal No.701 of 2008, I.A.No.3249/2010 in MAT Appeal No.812 of 2009 and Crl.M.A.No.11396/2010 in RPFC No.386/2009
Dated this the 3rd December, 2010
ORDER/JUDGMENT
Basant, J.
These appeals and RPFC have come up at the request of the parties. The parties have settled all their outstanding disputes. All the petitions, i.e. I.A.No.3250 of 2010, I.A.No. 3249 of 2010 and Crl.M.A. No.11396 of 2010 have been filed for permission to withdraw the MAT Appeals/RPFC. Parties have settled their disputes and a copy of that settlement deed is also produced as Annexure-I in MAT Appeal No.701/2008. Both counsel submit that as the parties have settled their disputes, these MAT appeals may now be dismissed and proceedings in the RPFC may be closed. We have perused the Revision Petition and the impugned order. We are satisfied that the prayer of the petitioners can be
MAT Appl.No.701/2008 & conn.cases 2
accepted.
In the result,
a) MAT Appeal No.701/2008 is dismissed as
withdrawn.
b) MAT Appeal No.812/2009 is dismissed as
withdrawn.
c) RPFC No.386/2009 is dismissed as we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order on merits in the wake of the submission of the petitioners that they do not want to challenge the order.
R.BASANT
K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE
css/
A.B.Sajitha
Saejer.A.B.
Shamila.A.B.
Abdulkhader.M.
R.Basant
K.Surendra Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court