Faisal v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought change in bail conditions and release. Court found remand illegal due to lack of penal offences, ordered deemed release, and directed return of title deeds.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner deemed released on personal bond; title deeds to sureties returned without further liability.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 29TH MAGHA 1931
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 313 of 2010() ----------------------------CMP.NOS. 6201 & 6365 OF 2009 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, TIRUR
REVN. PETITIONER:PETITIONER/ACCUSED:-
FAISAL S/O.ALI, PATTAYIL HOUSE, PURATHOOR AMSOM, THRITHALLUR, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. MR. C.V.MANUVILSAN MR. P.K.KHALEEMUDHEEN MR. P.G.SURESH MS. K.VIDYA MR. M.R.VIBIN
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:---------------------------------STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR, REP.THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
ADV. MR. P.A. SALIM, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the remand to judicial custody was justified given the absence of incorporated penal offences in the police report.
Whether imposing conditions requiring sureties to produce title deeds was legally sustainable.
Whether the petitioner should be deemed released to avoid continued custody liability.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Faisal S/o. Ali
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
V. Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court