Dismissed
Venugopalan v. the State of Kerala
Kerala HCCrl.Rev.Pet/1609/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI
FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1609 of 2002()
------------------------------------------CRA.465/1999 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT FAST TRACK-II (ADHOC), THRISSUR CC.67/1996 of JUDL. MAGISTRTE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, THRISSUR
PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------------------------VENUGOPALAN, AGED 38, S/O. KUMARAN, VENMANI HOUSE, MANNUR DESOM, MULAYAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. MR.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/STATE OF KERALA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REKHA C.NAIR.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.Q. BARKATH ALI, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P. No. 1609 of 2002
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of March 2010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
O R D E R
The counsel for the revision petitioner is absent. Hence the revision petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
P.Q. BARKATH ALI JUDGE
nl
VENUGOPALAN
STATE OF KERALA
P.Q.BARKATH ALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court