Firose v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner accused sought quashing of final report and proceedings in a criminal complaint. Court held proceeding too early for quash and permitted discharge plea in absentia.
What did the court decide?
Case disposed; right to plead for discharge in absentia permitted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2010 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1932
Crl.MC.No. 934 of 2010()
-----------------------CP.130/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, NADAPURAM
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED
OYINJIKKARA FIROSE, S/O.POKER, OYINJIKKARA HOUSE, VALAYAM AMSOM, DESOM, VADAKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN
SMT.THUSHARA.V
RESPONDENT(S): STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether to exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings at this stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
OYINJIKKARA FIROSE
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court