Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused to quash the Sessions Court order cancelling bail, holding it not in the interest of justice to interfere. However, to prevent incarceration during trial, the court directed the Magistrate to dispose of the case expeditiously within one month after receiving the final report.
What did the court decide?
Magistrate to dispose of C.C.408/2009 within one month; bail order not interfered with in this petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1932
Crl.MC.No. 3983 of 2010()
-----------------------------------
- ( ORDER IN CRL.M.C.2020/2009 OF HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT ERNAKULAM IN CRIME NO.1178/2009 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION IN ERNAKULAM DT)
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 2 TO 6
------------------------------------------------
1. KUMAR, S/O.MARY, AGED 27, H.NO.7, NEW HOUSE NO.13, 8TH STREET, RAJAMANGALAM, WILLIVAGAM, CHENNAI - 48, TAMILNADU.
2. KISHORE, AGED 26, S/O.VENKITAYA, DOOR NO.5, GOVT.COLONY, BENGEL MUNDALAM, KAERKAL COPPA, BITHRAGUNDL, NEAR BYEPASS NELLOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRAPRADESH.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Sessions Court order cancelling bail granted by the Magistrate.
Whether the petitioners can remain in custody while the trial is pending.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ACCUSED 2 TO 6
- respondent
COMPLAINANT
Coram
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court