Petitioner sought permission to withdraw criminal miscellaneous petition as annexure order lacked procedural basis under CrPC. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to challenge order before appropriate forum.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge the order before appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932
Crl.MC.No. 2837 of 2010() -------------------------------------(NO.B2/2239/2010 OF REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ADOOR)
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
SASIDHARAN PILLAI, DEVI VILASAM, ENATH VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.I.GEORGEKUTTY, SRI.K.K.SETHUKUMAR.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.A. SALIM
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
Crl.M.C.No.2837 of 2010
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition as Annexure-2 order is not passed either under Section 145 or 133 or 138 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order before appropriate forum.
1st October, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge) tkv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed to proceed given the absence of a specific procedural order.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
SASIDHARAN PILLAI
STATE OF KERALA
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
