A final contempt order where the court closed the case because both parties agreed that the directions in Annexure I order were complied with and no relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2010 / 23RD ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1094 of 2010(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6710/2006 ....................
PETITIONER(S): ---------------
C.D.SASIKUMAR,S/O.LATE SHRI.DAMODHARAN BHATTATHIRI,AGED 57 YEARS,RESIDING AT CHENNAMANGALATH ILLOM,KINAYATHODI, KODUNTHIRAPPULLY.P.O,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. (RETIRED IST GRADE DRAFTSMAN).
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
DR.S.RAVEENDRAN.I.A.S. S/O.(FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)RESIDING AT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEY & LAND RECORDS,VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
Contempt Case (C).No. 1094 of 2010
==================
Dated this the 15th day of October, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Both sides agree that the direction in Annexure I order has been
complied with. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
C.D.SASIKUMAR
DR.S.RAVEENDRAN
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
